WASHINGTON
(By
Anne E. Kornblut and Lori
Montgomery, Washington Post) September 3, 2010 — With
just two months until the November elections, the White House is seriously
weighing a package of business tax breaks - potentially worth hundreds of
billions of dollars - to spur hiring and combat Republican charges Democratic
tax policies hurt small businesses, according to people with knowledge of the
deliberations.
Among the options under consideration are a temporary payroll-tax holiday and a
permanent extension of the now-expired research-and-development tax credit,
which rewards companies that conduct research into new technologies within the
United States.
Administration officials have struggled to develop new economic policies and an
effective message to blunt expected Republican gains in Congress and defuse
complaints from Democrats President Obama is fumbling the issue most important
to voters. Following Obama's vacation and focus on foreign policy in recent
weeks, White House advisers have arranged a series of economic events for the
president next week, including two trips to swing states and a news conference.
"We'll continue to do everything we can, understanding recovery will require
persistent effort. There are no silver bullets," senior Obama adviser David
Axelrod said in an interview Thursday. "At the same time, we have to make clear
our ideas and theirs, and the fact the Washington Republicans, having helped
create this recession, have attempted to block our every effort to deal with
it."
But with the unemployment rate expected to rise again in jobs numbers due out
Friday, panic is setting in among many Democratic candidates who fear it is too
late for Obama to convince voters he understands the depth of the nation's
economic woes and can fix them.
White House officials cautioned no tax cuts have been settled on and a more
limited measure could emerge. Policy staffers are debating a range of options.
For example, a payroll-tax holiday - a top priority of many business groups -
could be applied only to new hires or extended to current employees. It could be
limited to small businesses or extended to larger firms.
Timing problems
If administration officials can agree on a policy path, it is not clear it would
be approved in the current environment on Capitol Hill. And even if Congress did
approve new measures to bolster the economy, they would probably come too late
to make a difference in the lives of recession-weary voters before the midterms.
"Substantively, there is nothing they could do between now and Election Day that
would have any measurable effect on the economy. Nothing," said the Brookings
Institution's William Galston, who was a domestic-policy adviser to President
Bill Clinton.
Over the past year, with the jobless rate hovering near 10 percent, Obama has
repeatedly promised to shift from other matters to the economy. He did so again
this week, saying during his Oval Office address on Iraq he would turn to the
economy "in the days to come."
But some Democratic candidates and political operatives feel the president is
not doing enough to help them keep control of Congress, privately expressing
frustration Obama has recently emphasized issues other than the economy.
"We did the mosque, Katrina, Iraq, and now Middle East peace?" said a Democratic
strategist who works closely with multiple candidates and spoke on the condition
of anonymity. "And in between you redo the Oval Office? It has become a joke."
Many economists say Obama's policies have been reasonably effective at pulling
the nation back from recession. Last year's stimulus package - now estimated to
cost $814 billion - protected as many as 3.3 million jobs, according the
independent Congressional Budget Office.
Nonetheless, Obama's efforts to give the economy another boost have been stymied
since the spring, when members of both parties became keenly aware of rising
public concern about the national debt.
Election Day looms
Last November, Obama announced he would turn his attention to unemployment,
calling it "one of the great challenges that remains in our economy." He
declared the same intent two months later, telling House Democrats he would
focus relentlessly on job creation "over the next several months." Senior aides
went on television pledging the mantra would become "jobs, jobs, jobs."
But other matters - health care, the BP oil spill - continually stole the
limelight, creating the impression, some Democrats complain, the president was
barely focused on the economy at all.
His advisers described his attentiveness - noting, for example, he discussed the
economy with New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (I) for 15 minutes before
golfing - but got little traction.
"Obviously it's going to be hard to get anything done before the election, but
it's really important for him to try, and to make the case to the American
people he's trying to do something and the Republicans aren't letting him," said
Steve Elmendorf, a Democratic strategist. "We are at the final moments here."
Obama has another incentive to act: Tax cuts enacted during the George W. Bush
administration are scheduled to expire in January, and Democrats - accused by
Republicans of plotting to let them vanish - feel compelled to do something
before the midterms.
Obama campaigned on a pledge to let cuts expire for the richest 2 percent of
households, but some Democrats say the economy is too weak to raise anyone's
taxes right now. And they fear a backlash from small-business owners who could
be hit with higher taxes.
Pairing targeted business tax breaks with an extension of middle-class tax cuts
could help alleviate those problems.
Permanently extending the research credit would cost roughly $100 billion over
the next decade, tax analysts said. And depending on its form and duration, a
payroll-tax holiday could cost more than $300 billion. While costing
significantly less than last year's stimulus package, both ideas would be far
more dramatic than anything the White House has so far acknowledged considering.
More spending on infrastructure, particularly transportation projects, is also
under discussion. But it would be easier for a package composed purely of tax
cuts to "avoid the stain of a 'bailout' or 'stimulus' label," said one official
familiar with the talks, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the
deliberations were private.
The president could roll out additional measures as soon as next week. Senate
leaders hope to begin debating the tax issue in late September.