| |
|
|
|
 |
|
U.S. Congressman
Luis Gutierrez, 4th
Congressional District of Illinois, says it's scandalous
this Congress has done nothing on immigration and
President Obama has made things worse. The Barack Obama
administration will exceed the number of family
separations and deportations than even at the height of
George Bush, which is saying a lot. Obama does not
understand the fear and the devastation that are going
on. It is urgent to take care of today not tomorrow. |
|
|
 |
|
César Chávez at a United Farmworkers
rally, 1974.
Sí, se puede (Spanish for "Yes, it is possible" or,
roughly, "Yes, it can be done" is the motto of the
United Farm Workers. In 1972, during Cesar Chavez's 24
day fast in Phoenix, Arizona, he and UFW's co-founder,
Dolores Huerta came up with the slogan. |
|
|
How Cubans Come to America |
|
How Mexicans Come to America |
|
How Puerto Ricans Come to America |
|
Why Cubans Vote Republican |
|
Marco Antonio Rubio |
|
The Right Way to Mend Immigration |
|
Numbers USA, a Little
Known Group, Claims Immigration Defeat Victory |
|
|
 |
|
Act America Captain America is a copyright owned by
Walt Disney Productions. A letter was submitted
yesterday asking permission to use Captain America as
the Act America logo. If we receive it, great. If we do
not, we shall have a similar logo designed. According to
our copyright attorney, use of a copyright design owned
by another party must be more than 10% different from
the original.
|
|
|
Act Arizona |
|
|
Obama's Promesa Por Cumplir (Unkept Promise)
(final editing/revisions were made 3/25/2010)
In this
article:
|
• |
An assessment of the current
status of Immigration Reform
which in our opinion will not
happen this year, nor 2011 or
2012. |
|
• |
Hispanic Americans are not a
monolithic group. The United
States treats Puerto Ricans,
Cubans and Mexicans differently
in regards to immigration,
voting and civil rights. The
Mexican category in this article
includes all other Latin
Americans. These three groups
are treated differently on
immigration passage into the
United States greatly
influencing how each group
prioritizes Immigration Reform.
Puerto Ricans are freely able to
enter and leave the USA;
therefore, Puerto Ricans have no
need for Immigration Reform.
Cubans are nearly the same as
Puerto Ricans. One toe on U.S.
soil and Cubans
are allow to
remain in the United States, and
later would qualify for
expedited "legal permanent
resident" status and U.S.
citizenship.
Mexicans give Immigration Reform
the highest priority in the land
even ahead of health care reform
because they have no access into
the U.S. by any means except the
normal visa process which can
take as long as 20 years to
obtain. |
|
• |
An assessment of the Senators
Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and
Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) plan is
provided. The plan has no
Hispanic input and Hispanic News
believes a punitive plan is no
better than no plan. Hispanic
News is now drafting a revised
plan and will share it with all
Hispanics in the U.S. for input.
Upon reaching a consensus, the
Hispanic News Plan will be
shared with the U.S. Congress
and the White House. |
|
• |
Lastly, a plan on how to achieve
Immigration Reform is
implemented. Hispanic News
establishes Act America —
modeled after Numbers USA used
by the Republicans to
successfully kill Immigration
Reform in 2007 — to become the
primary vehicle to achieve
Immigration Reform. It is long
overdue we use sophisticated
networking tools Obama used in
winning the Presidency and
others use to lobby the U.S.
Congress. The website "Act
America" is now published to
make Immigration Reform a
reality. Begin today to network
with everyone in your email list
to begin this Immigration Reform
movement by using:
|
SANTA FE, NM (By
Jon
Garrido, The Jon Garrido News Network)
March 23, 2010 —
President Barack Obama promised to address the issue in his first
year, but the deadline came and went as he struggled to pass a
healthcare bill. Hispanic voters, who were a crucial piece of Obama's
winning coalition in the 2008 campaign, have grown impatient. Some
advocates of an immigration overhaul warn Hispanic voters will stay home
in the November mid-term elections if Immigration Reform is not approved
before November.
In its first year,
the Obama administration was on track to deport nearly 400,000
immigrants — far more than during George W. Bush's last year in office.
On the anniversary of Obama's inauguration, Hoy, the Spanish-language
newspaper in Chicago, ran a full-page picture of the president on its
cover under the headline "Promesa Por Cumplir" ("Unkept Promise"). The
sense of betrayal among Hispanics — especially immigrants — is palpable,
just as it was after Obama's 2006 "yes" vote on the border fence.
On November 11, In an attempt to defuse
Hispanic anger, Obama met with a group of 14 immigration advocates in
the Roosevelt Room of the White House. Following by Obama meeting with
two senators, one a Republican and the other, a Democrat, working to
draft a bipartisan Immigration Reform bill.
Some
of the 14 immigration advocates after
the White House meeting with Obama, described the atmosphere in the room
as tense. They said they told Obama families were being severed by
widespread deportations. In the fiscal year that ended in September, the
U.S. deported 388,000 undocumented immigrants, according to the
Department of Homeland Security — up from 369,000 the year before.
"I don't think the president liked
hearing the immigration system is tearing apart families. But that's our
reality," said Ali Noorani, executive director of the National
Immigration Forum, who attended the meeting.
Obama recommended they meet with
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to discuss deportation
policies. An obvious "pass the buck" gimmick using Homeland Secretary
Janet Napolitano to explain why deportations are up as if Obama did not
know.
After the immigration advocates meeting, a pair of influential senators
presented President Obama with a three-page blueprint for a bipartisan
agreement to overhaul the nation's immigration system, but the
proposal's viability is threatened by politics surrounding the
healthcare debate.
Sens. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lindsey
Graham (R-S.C.), in a 45-minute meeting on March 11, in the Oval
Office, also asked for Obama's help in rounding up enough Republican
votes to pass an immigration bill this year.
Schumer has been trying to line up
additional Republican co-sponsors in
hopes of broadening the bill's
bipartisan support but none has signed
on. Even without the healthcare
obstacle, passing an immigration bill
would be difficult.
At the March 11
meeting with Schumer and Graham,
President Obama said he would proceed
with an overhaul of the immigration
system this year if he could attract
substantial Republican support but
Lindsey Graham, a leading Republican
senator who supports an immigration
overhaul said an immigration bill could
not go forward if the president used a
legislative shortcut sidestepping
Republicans to pass his health care
bill.
If Republicans do
not sign on as sponsors, Immigration
Reform in 2010 will not be pursued. If
Republicans pick off seats in the 2010
election, the Republicans will be
energized to continue to defy Obama in
2011 which brings us to 2012 which is a
presidential election year and we all
know Immigration Reform will not be
pursued by Obama or the Republicans so
the earliest date for Immigration Reform
is 2013.
Details of the
Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lindsey
Graham (R-S.C.) blueprint were published
in their letter signed March 19 and are
included as an exhibit to this article.
Graham also said the proposal included
"a rational plan to deal with the
millions of undocumented immigrants
already in the United States." In a
recent interview, Graham suggested
onerous measures were unrealistic.
"We're not going to mass-deport people
and put them in jail, nor should we,"
Graham said. "But we need a system so
they don't get an advantage over others
for citizenship."
In a statement after the Obama meeting,
Graham predicted their effort would
collapse if Senate Democrats proceeded
with a strategy to pass a healthcare
bill through a simple majority vote — a
process known as "reconciliation."
Senate leaders say they are committed to
doing just that.
"I expressed, in no uncertain terms, my
belief Immigration Reform could come to
a halt for the year if health care
reconciliation goes forward," said
Graham, who portrayed the document
handed to Obama as "a work in progress."
Graham added: "For more than a year,
healthcare has sucked most of the energy
out of the room. Using reconciliation to
push healthcare through will make it
much harder for Congress to come
together on a topic as important as
immigration."
What Happened to Si Se Puede?
This has not been a good political week
for the Hispanic community. Hispanic
leaders in the House caved to Democratic
pressure and endorsed the health care
bill approved Sunday in the House.
Some members of the Hispanic Caucus have
long been opposed to the Senate version
because it would bar undocumented
immigrants from using their own money to
purchase insurance on the exchange that
would be created for the uninsured and
it would exclude legal immigrants from
accessing the exchange for five years.
The House passed the Senate bill with
some changes that will be done through
reconciliation. Unfortunately, those
changes must be germane to the budget
and immigration can not be fixed this
way. “We know understanding political
reality of this moment, it's smart to
embrace the bill and move it along,”
Hector Sanchez, a representative of the
Labor Council for Latin American
Advancement told reporters on Capitol
Hill Friday, “We have been flexible
enough to move this issue forward but
legislative leaders better deliver when
Immigration Reform comes to the table.”
In fact, the Hispanic community remains
divided opposing the bill.
To add insult to injury, Sunday passage
of the bill completely drowned out a
long-planned march on Capitol Hill in
support of Immigration Reform.
Lack of
progress on Immigration Reform rankling
Hispanics
The Senate language would prohibit
undocumented immigrants’ buying
healthcare coverage from the proposed
health exchanges.
Before the
historic House vote on Sunday approving
the Health Care Reform Bill, Hispanic
Democrats said they would not vote for a
healthcare bill containing the Senate’s
prohibitions.
They claimed while it may be politically
popular in some parts of the country to
ban undocumented immigrants from using
their own money to buy coverage, it is
not good policy. Undocumented immigrants
will, one way or another, need medical
attention in the United States, and it
would be cheaper and more humane to
provide them coverage if they pay for
it. Otherwise, they will seek treatments
in the nation’s emergency rooms,
effectively increasing medical costs.
This would not be an issue if Congress
and the President had passed a
comprehensive Immigration Reform bill
during the fourteen months of the Obama
administration.
You legalize the nation's 11-13 million
undocumented immigrants, then it doesn't
matter whether undocumented immigrants
are barred from coverage under the
health care reform bill. It's pretty
much that simple.
Aside from the policy consideration,
however, is the political
Candidate Obama promised to make
Immigration Reform a priority during his
first year in office and the Hispanic
vote surged to 10 million, from 7.8
million in 2004, and swung eight
percentage points toward the Democrats.
Hispanics gave 59 percent of their vote
to John Kerry in 2004 but gave Obama 67
percent in 2008. The immigrant Hispanic
vote expanded from 52 percent for Kerry
to 75 percent for Obama, enough to
deliver California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and
Florida — and arguably North Carolina,
Indiana and Pennsylvania.
As President, Obama has followed the
cerebral strategy increased enforcement
will win support for Immigration Reform.
But if there is no serious progress on
the issue, many disillusioned Hispanics
will stay home in November.
Early whip counts are there are 40
Democrats and one Republican — Lindsey
Graham. 3-5 Democrats are definite no's
(Ben Nelson, Robert Byrd, and Kent
Conrad), the rest are gettable. On the
Republican side, there are about 30-32
definite no's, leaving another 9-11
possible pickups, like the Maine twins,
Olympia Snowe (R) Susan Collins. Then
again, Graham claims if health care
reform passes via reconciliation,
Immigration Reform is dead because
Republicans will not work with
Democrats.
Even if supporters can't get to 60, and
this will be subject to the Mother Of
All Filibusters, have the vote anyway.
Show Hispanics you are fighting for us.
People don't mind losses. In fact,
losing voters are a great way to
identify roadblocks to reform. What
people hate are Democrats making
promises, then helplessly shrugging
their shoulders because they don't have
60 votes.
People voted for Democrats because they
promised to fight for issues they cared
deeply about. This is one of the issues
they promised to deliver on. Now they
should either deliver, or hold a vote to
show Hispanics who is standing in the
way of reform. If Lindsey Graham wants
Hispanics to see his party once again
standing en masse in the way of a key
priority, so let it be.
Nothing energizes voters more than a
good villain, and heavens knows,
Democrats need their base voters
energized.
Immigration is a delicate issue for the
White House. After promising to revamp
in his first year of office what many
see as a fractured system, Obama risks
angering a growing, politically potent
Hispanic constituency if he defers the
goal until 2011.
But with approval of the healthcare
bill, Democrats are wary of plunging
into another polarizing issue.
Immigration Reform Is Back on the
Agenda: What's the Political Strategy?
Do they really
want to get into the inevitable fight
with organized labor over guest workers
in an election year, especially when,
after the Citizens United ruling,
union dollars
will be more valuable than ever?
Surely they're not
that self-sabotaging.
But maybe there is strategic political wisdom in
bringing immigration to the fore. It's the sort of issue that could energize
two key demographics for Democrats: young people and Hispanics. Both groups
played important roles in propelling Obama to victory in 2008, and both are
showing signs they're not motivated to turn out this fall. Putting
Immigration Reform in the headlines could change that.
With
Democrats in charge of the process, immigration will probably be a far more
toxic issue for Republicans than Democrats. Just ask John McCain, whose
support for reform almost cost him the Republican nomination in 2008 and
continued to dog him throughout his campaign. Immigration could inspire
heated primary challenges to moderate Republicans, or spur independents and
tea partiers to jump into races, particularly in the House. Immigration is a
wedge issue for Republicans, and in an election year Democrats may very well
benefit.
It's a bit
too early in the process to speculate with any accuracy what the Obama
administration's plans for reform would look like.
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus,
quiet until just before approval of the House Health Care bill despite the
probability of the Senate’s bill becoming the baseline product, did threaten to
take down the bill over the harsh immigration provisions in the Senate version.
These provisions include the banning of undocumented workers from the exchanges,
even to purchase health insurance with their own money.
They claim while it may be
politically popular in some parts of the country to ban undocumented immigrants
from using their own money to buy coverage, it is not good policy. Undocumented
immigrants will, one way or another, need medical attention in the United
States, and it would be cheaper and more humane to provide them coverage if they
pay for it. Otherwise, they will seek treatments in the nation’s emergency
rooms, effectively increasing medical costs.
The Hispanic Caucus supported health
care reform at the expense of
Immigration Reform because Immigration
Reform is not the highest priority in
the land for Puerto Ricans like the
Congressional Hispanic Caucus
chairperson, Congresswoman Nydia M.
Velázquez, a Puerto Rican American
politician.
The decision to vote "yes" on health
care reform knocked down another
potential roadblock to reaching
the necessary 216
votes for final passage,
outside of steep political concerns
about the bill's impact on the midterm
elections.
At the very least, the Hispanic Caucus
should have traded their votes for
Immigration Reform. They did not.
In a deal with Congressman Stupak to
obtain his vote, White House announced a
Presidential Executive Order on abortion
affirming no federal funds will be spent
on abortion.
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.), a Puerto
Rican America and the only exception to
the premise only Mexican Americans rate
Immigration Reform as the highest
priority in the USA, and several other
CHC members had been threatening to
withhold their support because of
provisions the Senate added restricting
illegal immigrants from using their own
money to access the insurance exchanges
that would be established by the
proposed legislation.
Illinois Democrat
Luis Gutierrez says it's scandalous this
Congress has done nothing on immigration
and President Obama has made things
worse.
Representative
Gutierrez
said, "This administration of Barack
Obama will exceed the number of family
separations and deportations than even
at the height of George Bush, which is
saying a lot. Understand the fear and
the devastation that are going on. You
know, it needs to get taken care of.
It's the plight of some 12 million
illegal immigrants that busloads of
their supporters came to Washington to
change.
If the Congressional Hispanic Caucus had
taken a page from Congressman Stupak's
play book trading his opposition to
abortion to obtain his vote for passage
of Health Care Reform, the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus could have at least
traded their votes for Obama's assurance
Immigration Reform would follow Health
Care Reform.
Chairperson Congresswoman Nydia
Velazquez (D-N.Y.), with more than 20
CHC members behind her, told reporters
the broader impact of the legislation
overrode the other concerns. She said
8.8 million Hispanics would gain
insurance coverage in the legislation, a
"historic opportunity" not to be missed.
Nydia Velazquez obviously indifferent to
Immigration Reform was outsmarted by the
White House and thus freely gave away
her bargaining power and caved in.
This is substantial evidence not all
Hispanics think alike. It is evident
Puerto Rican Americans (Congressman
Gutierrez being the only exception) view
Immigration Reform from a different
point of reference. To Puerto Ricans
Americans, Immigration Reform takes a
back seat to Health Care Reform.
Not so with
Puerto Rican American Congressman
Gutierrez. The highest priority in
America is Immigration Reform for
the congressman.
Allaying a lingering concern about
immigration issues in the health-care
battle, the Congressional Hispanic
Caucus announced its unanimous support
for President Obama's key domestic
agenda initiative.
That is why Hispanics from Mexico and
Latin America understand the need for
Immigration Reform and why the Hispanic
Caucus Puerto Ricans (Again with the
exceptional Congressman Gutierrez) and
Cubans should be tarred and feathered.
Another example to substantiate Puerto
Rican Americans and Cuban Americans are
indifferent to Immigration Reform is
U.S.
Senator Robert
Menendez,
a Cuban American, who is no where
to be found in the U.S. Senate fighting
for Immigration Reform. (Exhibit A: It
is two non-Hispanics drafting the next
U.S. Senate bill on Immigration Reform).
This should be the basis for only
electing Mexican American Hispanics
because Cubans nor Puerto Ricans don't
understand the plight of Latin American
Hispanics to the U.S. Senate.
The March for
America
Sunday afternoon
at about the
same time the
House met for
what was a final
showdown on
health care,
tens of thousand
of people
marched on the
capital. This
particular
demonstration
was about
overhauling the
nation's
immigration
laws.
The March 21 pep
rally in
Washington was a
great step
forward but will
do little to
advance
Immigration
Reform.
It was called
"The March for
America" and its
aim was getting
Congress to act
on immigration
this year.
But now with
Health Care
Reform approved
only by the
Democrats,
Republicans will
stand tall in
opposition to
Immigration
Reform this
year, despite
renewed efforts
to make
Immigration
Reform happen.
Obama claims he
needs Republican
sponsors to the
Immigration
Reform bill so
this begs the
question: Why
did we vote for
Obama?
Gabe Gonzalez of
Washington's
Center for
Community Change
is the March for
America's lead
organizer. He
says lawmakers
would be foolish
to ignore
Sunday's march,
since 10 million
highly-motivated
Hispanics voted
in the last
presidential
election.
Gonzalez adds,
"There's a
number of
elections across
the country
where Hispanic
and immigrant
votes will be
the difference,
and there's
going to be a
huge problem
with intensity
if something
isn't done on
Immigration
Reform. Of this
we are certain."
Mr. Darrell West
of the Brookings
Institution
said, "Obama is
the only one who
could help pull
together the
coalition
necessary for
comprehensive
Immigration
Reform. It's
always good to
have senators
who are taking
the lead, but in
the end, it's
the President
who needs to
sell this
message.
Hispanic Americans are not a
Monolithic Group
In the United
States Senate, there is one Hispanic American representing all USA
Hispanics but not all Hispanic Americans think as one monolithic group.
How we
arrived in the United States has a significant influence on how we think
as American Hispanics.
Puerto
Ricans, Cubans and Mexicans are all treated differently by the United
States government. (In this article all other Latin American groups
where there are subtle cultural differences are grouped together as one
group for immigration purposes and this is the "Mexican" group).
The Puerto
Ricans are U.S. Citizens so they do not have to deal with immigration
law. They can freely enter and leave the Untied States. They can vote in
all U.S. Elections if they are residents within the United States.
Cubans need
only to put one toe on U.S. soil and they are granted automatic
provisions on becoming a U.S. citizen.
Mexicans even
thought there is a treaty between the United States and Mexico granting
some special considerations to the Mexicans and their descendents, all
Mexicans must adhere to all immigration law as all other persons from
all other countries. Separated by only a line in the sand or river,
Mexicans have no consideration for entry by visa other than as required
by all other persons, except Puerto Ricans and Cubans, in the world.
Puerto Ricans
and Cubans do not have to comply with stringent archaic immigration laws
of the United States. Consequently, all persons entering the United
States utilize a different point of reference than all others except
Puerto Ricans and Cubans who are given special preferences resulting in
Mexicans and all other Latin Americans treated as outcasts.
This is a
profound significant reason why Puerto Ricans and Cubans do not view the
need for Immigration Reform as do Mexicans.
Puerto Ricans
Puerto Rico
is an "unincorporated territory" of the United States which according to
the U.S. Supreme Court's Insular Cases is "a territory appurtenant and
belonging to the United States, but not a part of the United States."
Puerto Rico is subject to U.S. federal law, even though Puerto Rico is
not a state of the American Union but has no voting representative in
the U.S. Congress.
Since 1917,
people born in Puerto Rico are U.S. citizens and therefore can enter and
leave the United States as any other U.S. citizen; however, federal
electoral law does not grant a vote to any citizen who does not live in,
or qualify as an absentee resident in, one of the fifty states or the
District of Columbia. Thus, people who have always lived in Puerto Rico
cannot vote in federal elections, but people born in Puerto Rico and
living in a state or in DC can vote.
Cubans
Political
upheaval in Cuba created new waves of Cuban immigrants to the U.S.
between 1960–1980. In 1959, after the Cuban revolution led by Fidel
Castro, a large Cuban exodus began as the new government allied itself
with the Soviet Union and began to introduce communism. From 1960 to
1979, hundreds of thousands of Cubans left Cuba and began a new life in
the United States. Most Cuban Americans that arrived in the United
States initially came from Cuba's educated upper and middle classes.
Between December 1960 and October 1962 more than 14,000 Cuban children
arrived alone in the U.S. Their parents were afraid that their children
were going to be sent to some Soviet bloc countries to be educated and
they decided to send them to the States as soon as possible.
This program
was called Operation Pedro Pan (Operation Peter Pan). When the children
arrived in Miami they were met by representatives of Catholic Charities
and they were sent to live with relatives if they had any or were sent
to foster homes, orphanages or boarding schools until their parents
could leave Cuba. In order to provide aid to recently arrived Cuban
immigrants, the United States Congress passed the Cuban Adjustment Act
in 1966. The Cuban Refugee Program provided more than $1.3 billion of
direct financial assistance. They also were eligible for public
assistance, Medicare, free English courses, scholarships, and
low-interest college loans. Some banks even pioneered loans for exiles
who did not have collateral or credit but received help in getting a
business loan. These loans enabled many Cuban Americans to secure funds
and start up their own businesses. With their Cuban-owned businesses and
low cost of living, Miami, Florida and Union City, New Jersey (dubbed
"Little Havana-on-the Hudson") were the preferred destinations for many
immigrants and soon became the main centers for Cuban American culture.
It was not until the mass exodus of the Cuban exiles in 1959 that Miami
started to become a preferred destination. Westchester, Florida within
Miami-Dade County, stands as the area most populated by Cubans and Cuban
Americans in the United States, followed by Hialeah, Florida in second.
Another large wave of an estimated 125,000 people of Cuban immigration
occurred in the early 1980s with the Mariel boatlifts. Most of the "Marielitos"
were people wanting to escape from communist tyranny, and have succeeded
in establishing their roots in the US.
The wet foot, dry foot policy is the name given to a consequence of the
1995 revision of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 that says,
essentially, that anyone who fled Cuba and got into the United States
would be allowed to pursue residency a year later. After talks with the
Cuban government, the Clinton administration came to an agreement with
Cuba it would stop admitting people found at sea. Since then, in what
has become known as the "wet foot, dry foot" policy, a Cuban caught on
the waters between the two nations (i.e., with "wet feet") would
summarily be sent home or to a third country. One who makes it to shore
("dry feet") gets a chance to remain in the United States, and later
would qualify for expedited "legal permanent resident" status and U.S.
citizenship.
Since the
mid-1990s, after the implementation of the "Wet Foot, Dry Foot" policy
immigration patterns changed. Many Cuban immigrants departed from the
southern and western coasts of Cuba and arrived at the Yucatán Peninsula
in Mexico; many landed on Isla Mujeres. From there Cuban immigrants
traveled to the Texas-Mexico border and found asylum. Many of the Cubans
who did not have family in Miami settled in Houston; this has caused
Houston's Cuban American community to increase in size. The term "dusty
foot" refers to Cubans immigrating to the U.S. through Mexico. In 2005
the Department of Homeland Security had abandoned the approach of
detaining every dry foot Cuban who crosses through Texas and began a
policy allowing most Cubans to obtain immediate parole.
Mexicans
Mexicans even
thought there is a treaty between the United States and Mexico granting
some special considerations to the Mexicans and their descendents, all
Mexicans must adhere to all immigration law as all other persons from
all other countries. Separated by only a line in the sand or river,
Mexicans have no consideration for entry by visa other as than required
by all others in the world.
Why Cuban Americans Vote Republican
Probably because Cubans do not like the
communist regime in Cuba and identify
with the Republican party's strong
anti-communist, pro-capitalist point of
view, Cuban Americans vote Republican.
To understand Miami Cuban politics, one
must go back to the Bay of Pigs
invasion, which some Miami Cubans will
tell you President John F. Kennedy
blundered.
The invasion took place two years after
Fidel Castro seized power from Fulgencio
Batista, a U.S.-backed dictator who
would order public executions of
children.
On April 17, 1961, a brigade of
CIA-trained Cuban exiles invaded a beach
in southern Cuba with the expectation
the United States Air Force would
provide them air support.
The air support never came. Kennedy
called it off when it became apparent
the American involvement in the invasion
was no secret and had the potential to
lead to a full-scale war against the
Soviet Union.
More than 1,200 exiles were captured and
118 killed in the failed invasion.
Although Kennedy negotiated a deal with
Castro to exchange $53 million in food
and medicine for the release of the
prisoners 20 months later, his
credibility within the exile community
was destroyed and the majority of Cuban
exiles became diehard Republicans.
“Our perception is JFK fell asleep at
the switch,” said Henry Gomez, a Cuban
American born in Miami who is a main
contributor on the right-wing blog
Babalu, which bills itself as an “island
on the net without a bearded dictator.”
Democratic presidents since then have
been perceived as dupes.
Former state House Speaker Marco
Rubio
Marco Antonio Rubio ( born May 28, 1971)
is a Cuban-American politician and
lawyer. Rubio was the Speaker of the
Florida House of Representatives during
the 2007 and 2008 legislative sessions.
He was first elected to the Florida
House as a Republican on January 25,
2000, from the 111th district. He is now
a candidate for the U.S. Senate seat
currently held by George LeMieux.
One of the purposes of this article is
to identify how to achieve Immigration
Reform and why Immigration Reform is not
given priority by some Hispanic groups.
In Florida, an ideal Hispanic candidate
is standing for election to the United
States Senate. Marco Rubio has nearly
all characteristics of an ideal Hispanic
candidate except he is a conservative
Republican and a favorite of the Tea Cup
Party.
If Rubio were to win election to the
U.S. Senate, Immigration Reform and
other civil rights programs would be
crushed. Clearly Rubio is a wolf
masquerading is sheep's clothing
portraying himself as a Hispanic. All
Hispanics in Florida should shun this
wolf masquerading as a Hispanic.
The Right Way to Mend Immigration By
Charles E. Schumer and Lindsey O. Graham
Our immigration system is badly broken.
Although our borders have become far
more secure in recent years, too many
people seeking illegal entry get
through. We have no way to track whether
the millions who enter the United States
on valid visas each year leave when they
are supposed to. And employers are
burdened by a complicated system for
verifying workers' immigration status.
Last week we met with President Obama to
discuss our draft framework for action
on immigration. We expressed our belief
America's security and economic
well-being depend on enacting sensible
immigration policies.
The answer is simple: Americans
overwhelmingly oppose illegal
immigration and support legal
immigration. Throughout our history,
immigrants have contributed to making
this country more vibrant and
economically dynamic. Once it is clear
that in 20 years our nation will not
again confront the specter of another 11
million people coming here illegally,
Americans will embrace more welcoming
immigration policies.
Our plan has four pillars: requiring
biometric Social Security cards to
ensure that illegal workers cannot get
jobs; fulfilling and strengthening our
commitments on border security and
interior enforcement; creating a process
for admitting temporary workers; and
implementing a tough but fair path to
legalization for those already here.
Schumer's and Graham's Blueprint is
the Wrong Way to Mend Immigration
There was
no Hispanic representation in the US
Senate on Immigration Reform of the bill
being drafted as "The Right Way to Mend
Immigration" by Charles E. Schumer and
Lindsey O. Graham. There was no Hispanic
input in the U.S. Senate even though
Senator Robert Menendez is a Cuban
American, but Menendez, a Cuban American
from New Jersey, fits the pattern of
this article of having no interest in
Immigration Reform.
Hispanic News recommends since there is
no Mexican American Hispanic U.S.
Senator, Senators Schumer and Graham
should at least hold public hearings.
Since the probability of public hearings
is zero, Hispanic News shall request
public input into a Immigration Reform
blueprint or rather preliminary bill
that satisfies Mexican American
Hispanics.
On a preliminary review of Schumer and
Graham's blueprint for Immigration
Reform, Hispanic News does not support:
1. A temporary worker program. On
August 4, 1942, the U.S. and the Mexican
government instituted the
Bracero
program which abused Mexican farm
workers in the USA. Do we want the same
again? In addition, why should a
temporary worker be excluded from
entering into the United States under
the auspices of the
precedent
established for the Cubans: One who
makes it to shore ("dry feet") gets a
chance to remain in the United States,
and later would qualify for expedited
"legal permanent resident" status and
U.S. citizenship. Mexicans deserve the
same as the provisions and ease of entry
given to the Cubans.
2. Schumer has in the past outlined his
principles for reform, which lean
towards a heavy focus on enforcement
rather than on family reunification or
humane reforms to the immigration
system. Hispanic News strongly supports
family reunification as the main thrust
of new Immigration Reform.
3. Why must all Hispanics learn English?
This is reminiscent of "English Only"
laws. If there is truly a justified need
for a person to learn English, then
English should be required but there may
be many who will never need English so
why should they be required to learn
English? The "English Only" requirement
needs to be eliminated.
4. Why must any Hispanic applicant for
U.S. Citizenship or visa have to admit
they broke any law on entering the
United States. Where is the provision
for the 5th amendment of the U.S.
Constitution that protects self
incrimination? Are Hispanic applicants
to be designated as a subservient class?
5. Please add your
comments here by sending me an email:
Jon@JonGarrido.com.
Act America
Hispanic News
beginning with
Act Arizona,
a concept of changing Arizona from Red
to Blue, now establishes Act America to
address national issues such as
Immigration Reform by using a Political
Action Committee to support America's
Hispanics.
There are many sincere efforts by
individuals, groups and organizations to
advance Immigration Reform, but the only
way to obtain Immigration Reform is to
defeat five United States senators who
in 2006-2007 were instrumental in
defeating Immigration Reform with their
anti-Hispanic vitriolic rhetoric.
We need to get rid of Republicans who in
2007 killed Immigration Reform in the
senate.
There are five
senators who were instrumental in
defeating Immigration Reform. These are
John McCain and Jon Kyl of Arizona, Kay
Hutchinson and John Cornyn of Texas and
Jess Sessions of Alabama.
The purpose of Act Arizona is to change
Arizona from Red to Blue. To gain
Immigration Reform, Arizona, Texas and
Alabama must be changed from Red to
Blue.
In addition to Arizona, Texas and
Alabama, there are other states that
have Republican senators that do not
support the growth of the Hispanic
community in America.
Republican Sens. David Vitter of
Louisiana and Bob Bennett of Utah
proposed an amendment to an
appropriations bill that would have
stopped funding of the 2010 Census
unless changes are were made that would
have excluded undocumented immigrants
from the population count used to
allocate congressional seats after the
2010 Census. It also would have required
the Census to ask people whether they
are citizens. The proposed amendment was
defeated.
Act America is not only about Arizona,
Texas and Alabama. When these three
states go from Red to Blue, ALL of
America's Hispanics will benefit. This
means Maria Lopez in New Hampshire, Jose
Sanchez in Alaska and even Elena Alonzo
in Iowa would share in America's
celebration of Hispanic growth of the
USA.
Act America is for all states in the
USA. Whichever state you live in, work
with us to make change across America
beginning with your state.
If you are not from Arizona, Texas or
Alabama, or another "Red" state, you can
still participate by making a donation
to make change. If you already live in a
"Blue" state, Act America still needs
your help to advance America's Hispanic
community.
If you do not believe in contributing to
political campaigns, then you do not
understand American politics;
consequently, no change will be
forthcoming. It is only with campaign
contributions that change in America
will advance America's Hispanic
community.
In May 2010, Hispanic News/Act America
will register with the Federal Election
Commission and proceed to open a bank
account to receive donations to support
candidates in the November 2010
congressional elections who will advance
America's Hispanic community.
If you are from Texas or Alabama, work
with Act America to make change in your
state. If you are from any other state
and want to make change in your state
and you support Immigration Reform,
contact us using information below.
Friends from Texas have already
contacted Act America and soon Act Texas
will be organized.
Hispanic News will work in partnership
with Act America to form the Hispanic
News/Act America Political Action
Committee and where articles supporting
the mission of the Hispanic News/Act
America Political Action Committee will
be published.
Numbers USA
When a comprehensive immigration bill
collapsed in 2007 on the Senate floor,
it was a victory for a small group that
had been lobbying Congress for a decade
to reduce the number of immigrants —
legal and illegal — in the United
States.
The group, Numbers USA,
tracked every twist and turn of the bill. Its members
flooded the Senate with more than a million faxes, sent
through the organization’s Web site. It supplied
arguments and information to senators opposing the bill.
Hispanic News will now add staff
and expertise to Act America to duplicate the "Numbers
USA" model used so effectively to kill Immigration
Reform in the United States Senate.
This time Act America will lobby
for passage of Immigration Reform.
----------------
The next articles in this series:
Act America Third
Party Movement
Act America House Caucus
— A new Hispanic
House Caucus is needed with its priority
being immigration reform. Since the
Puerto Ricans and Cubans do not consider
Immigration Reform to be a priority,
they will not be invited to join.
Act America Senate Caucus
— The highest priority in the land is to
elect Mexican American Hispanics to the
United States Senate.
Some content from
wire services, Washington Post,
Politico, New York Times.
If you
agree with the above, please share this
article with others so this information
and program will build a movement across
America to promote the passage of
Immigration Reform.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|










|